The restructuring of ACIP has exposed a tightly interconnected ecosystem of advisory bodies, advocacy organizations, and pharmaceutical sponsors whose financial interests are deeply embedded in vaccine policy at both the federal and state level. We focus this discussion on the American Academy of Pediatrics and American Families for Vaccines.
Last year, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., purged the CDCโs Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) citing conflicts of interest. He removed all seventeen voting members of the committee in June 2025, then provided a conflict of interest page on the CDC website so that Americans could explore the COIs of current and previous ACIP voting members. In the announcementdated June 9, 2025, Kennedy stated:
โACIPโs new members will prioritize public health and evidence-based medicine. The Committee will no longer function as a rubber stamp for industry profit-taking agendas. The entire world once looked to American health regulators for guidance, inspiration, scientific impartiality, and unimpeachable integrity. Public trust has eroded. Only through radical transparency and gold standard science, will we earn it back.โ
Kennedy also shed light on the significant conflicts of interest of ACIP non-voting liaison representative, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), one of the harshest critics of the changes taking place on the committee. As a long standing liaison to ACIP, the AAP helped shape vaccine approvals and recommendations for decades – recommendations that, while technically advisory, are embedded in โnearly 600 statutes and regulations across 49 states, three territories, and Washington, D.C.โ At the same time, the AAP received substantial financial support from vaccine manufacturers whose products are directly affected by ACIP recommendations, creating a feedback loop that benefits both AAP members (pediatricians) and their corporate sponsors.

In June 2025, as it boycotted ACIP meetings in response to new transparency requirements instituted by Secretary Kennedy, the AAP issued its own vaccine schedule. They then published a position statement in August 2025 in which they advocate for the removal of all non-medical, or religious, exemptions. They state:
โThe AAP advocates for the elimination of nonmedical exemptions from immunizations as contrary to optimal individual and public health.โ
Several states have begun adopting the AAPโs recommended vaccine schedule despite the significant financial conflicts of interest as well as the organizationโs advocacy for removal of a protected civil liberty: religious freedom. Decentralization of public health should be the goal of every state, but the state level departments of health that affiliate with an organization that openly advocates for the removal of civil liberties while profiting not only from policy implementation but also from corporate sponsorship of vaccine manufacturers is deeply problematic and incompatible with transparent, ethical governance.
In January, the AAP was named in a RICO lawsuit (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) alleging โthe organization has violated federal law by saying that vaccines on the federal child vaccine schedule are safe.โ Epoch Times reports:
โThe complaint alleges that RICO comes into play because AAP, vaccine manufacturers, and others are operating as part of an enterprise that aims to maintain and expand vaccine uptake โby assuring pediatricians, hospitals, parents, and policymakers that the schedule is categorically safe, while concealing material facts about the lack of testing, inadequacies in the vaccine safety monitoring programs, and financial incentives tied to vaccine schedule compliance.โโ
In addition to shaping federal vaccine policy, the AAP lobbies in statehouses across the country alongside another organization with significant vaccine industry ties: American Families for Vaccines. While AFV is formally a separate organization, its policy positions and partnerships closely mirror those of the AAP.
American Families for Vaccines (AFV) lists the AAP as one of its corporate โpartners.โ The organizationโs expanding network of affiliate state chapters actively promotes pro-vaccine legislation and the removal or restriction of religious exemptions from vaccine mandates – a shared policy position with AAP. In 2025, AFV expanded its organizational structure to include a 501(c)(4) Action Fund, enabling the organization to engage directly in legislative advocacy. They anticipate being in 30 states by the end of 2026. Their stated goal is โto unite families, health experts, lawmakers, and partners under one banner.โ
As of late 2025, AFV has established multiple state chapters, including (but not limited to):
Active State Chapters
- Arizona Families for Vaccines
- Colorado Families for Vaccines
- Louisiana Families for Vaccines
- Maine Families for Vaccines
- Massachusetts Families for Vaccines
- Montana Families for Vaccines
- Oregon Families for Vaccines
- Tennessee Families for Vaccines
- West Virginia Families for Vaccines
Most Recent Additions โ October/December 2025
- New Hampshire Families for Vaccines
- Florida Families for Vaccines
- South Carolina Families for Vaccines
- South Dakota Families for Vaccines
- Wisconsin Families for Vaccines
AFVโs LinkedIn job postings include a six-figure Political Director role and a salaried State Director position in West Virginia, both offering benefits.

Another co-director position in Louisiana shows similar compensation.

Advocacy for Eliminating Vaccine Exemptions
As the first AFV chapter to form, Maine Families for Vaccines has touted the elimination of the stateโs religious exemption as a 2019 policy victory, stating that:
โMaine has never been afraid to lead when it comes to doing whatโs right. In 2019, a group of concerned parents formed Maine Families for Vaccines and raised awareness about Maineโs dangerously high opt-out rate for vaccines after the state experienced outbreaks of whooping cough and chicken pox in schools and daycares.
We organized to pass PL 154, removing non-medical exemptions to school-required vaccination requirements. The law went into effect on September 1, 2021. For this work, Maine Families for Vaccines was awarded the Maine Public Health Associationโs Presidentโs Award, its highest honor.โ
The former president of the Maine chapter and current president of AFV and AFV Action Fund, Northe Saunders, traveled to Massachusetts last year to lobby in support of legislation that would remove that stateโs religious exemption, again boasting that the removal of religious exemptions in Maine was a policy win. Saunders continues to actively lobby in Massachusetts in coordination with other organizations including the Massachusetts chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Massachusetts Medical Society. Watch Saundersโ Massachusetts testimony in the video below.
AFVโs Action Fund is engaging lobbyists and pollsters across the country, including Florida, Massachusetts, and South Dakota, employing polling to influence public perception and support policy efforts to restrict exemptions.

Sustaining this level of multi-state lobbying, professional polling, and message testing requires significant financial investment, underscoring the role of well-funded interests in shaping these policy efforts. Still, the Florida chapter website asserts they are a โgrassrootsโ organization.

AFV president, Northe Saunders, traveled to Florida in January to lobby against legislation that would provide a personal belief exemption in state law. Hear his comments in the video below.
A Network of Industry Stakeholders with Aligned Financial Interests
The American Families for Vaccinesโ corporate partnerships include the American Academy of Pediatrics, vaccine manufacturersโMerck, GlaxoSmithKline, Moderna, Sanofiโas well as, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, aka BIO, another ACIP non-voting liaison member and an organization known to testify in state houses in opposition to bills that would provide vaccine transparency.

Each AFV corporate partner has identifiable financial or policy interests aligned with the expansion of vaccine uptake or requirements – all feeding into the profit margin of corporate sponsors. For example:
- Vaccinate Your Familyโs corporate sponsors include the CDC, Dynavax, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Moderna, Novavax, vaccine developer Dr. Paul Offit, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Seqirus.
- National Foundation for Infectious Diseasesโ corporate sponsors include AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Moderna, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Inc., Sanofi US, Seqirus USA Inc.
- Immunize.orgโs corporate sponsors include GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, CSL Seqirus, Novavax, and Dynavax.
Lastly, Voice for Vaccines is owned by Task Force for Global Health, Inc., which reported revenue of $96.9 million in 2024 while managing approximately $961 millionin pharmaceutical assets. The extensive list of foundations, corporations, government agencies, and nongovernmental organizations that partner with the Task Force for Global Health includes:
- Gates Foundation
- deBeaumont Foundation
- Johnson & Johnson
- Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., U.S.A.
- Novartis
- Pfizer Inc.
- UK aid
- USAID
- World Health Organization
The Task Force for Global Health finances the following programs:
- Brighton Collaboration
- Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance
- Children Without Worms
- Coalition for Global Hepatitis Elimination
- Focus Area for Compassion and Ethics in Global Health
- Global Funders Consortium for Universal Influenza Vaccine Development
- Health Campaign Effectiveness Coalition
- International Trachoma Initiative
- Mectizanยฎ Donation Program
- MedSurplus Alliance
- Migration Health Initiative
- Neglected Tropical Diseases Support Center
- Partnership for International Vaccine Initiatives
- Polio Eradication Center
- Public Health Informatics Institute
- Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network
- Voices for Vaccines
Taken together, these organizations operate within a shared ecosystem of pharmaceutical funding, regulatory influence, and policy advocacy, giving them material stakes in the expansion of vaccine requirements. As such, they cannot reasonably be characterized as disinterested parties in debates over vaccine policy, transparency, or religious exemptions.
AFVโs claims of independence warrant scrutiny in light of its funding criteria and industry-backed partnerships.
AFV presents itself as independent of industry interests; however, its Statement of Independence specifies that funding is accepted only for activities aligned with its โmission and vision.โ That vision explicitly supports the removal of religious exemptions to vaccination and is financially supported by vaccine manufacturers, calling claims of independence into serious question. When an organization backed by industry interests actively advocates for policies that would curtail religious freedomโa constitutionally protected civil libertyโin medical decision-making, the implications are profound and demand heightened scrutiny.
When vaccine policy is shaped by organizations financially aligned with the outcomes of those policies, transparency, independence, and respect for civil liberties are not optional, they are imperative. Policymakers must recognize when advocacy crosses the line from public health into a direct threat to civil liberties and reject the influence of organizations whose stated goals include the removal of constitutionally protected rights. Upholding informed consent and religious freedom demands vigilance, independence, and the courage to place the rights of citizens above the priorities of well-funded interest groups.
These entanglements underscore why statutory protections like the Medical Freedom Act are no longer optional but necessary, to restore informed consent, prevent coercion, and ensure that medical decisions remain with individuals and families rather than industry-aligned policy networks.
Speak up. Show up. Stand firm. Freedom grows when we do.
Be a part of our historic lawsuit against the CDC. Every donation to Stand for Health Freedom helps funds our efforts to end medical mandates and restore parental authority in medical decision making.

The Vaccine Decision: Every Shot Has A Story is available now!

