“More and more parents are leery of allowing their children in [public] schools,” said Attorney John Klar. “This isn’t just vaccine hesitancy anymore. This is public school hesitancy.”
Klar recently sat down with SHF’s Leah Wilson to discuss a current case that’s critical to parental rights. His clients’ son was vaccinated at school without their consent. And the Vermont Supreme Court ruled that they didn’t even have the right to bring litigation against the school.
*Adding another wrinkle to the story: The school apparently received cash incentives from the state based on vaccination rates, and school personnel were reportedly disappointed because many parents had declined shots.
We at SHF have been reporting on the ominous rise of School-based Health Centers (SBHCs) for a few years now. The very design of these clinics sacrifices safety and parental rights putting kids in ongoing danger. Visit our SBHC page to learn how you can stand against them.
Klar says this case is, at its core, a parental rights issue and that parents have “established, recognized, fundamental, constitutional liberties … to control the decision-making surrounding their child’s health care” and that they must be informed “before they are administered any kind of intervention.”