NEW JERSEY: Stop politicians from censoring medical professionals
Our Stand: At-A-Glance
UPDATE! October 3, 2024
- Bill A1884 & S3700, which many believe should be renamed A 1984 due to its Orwellian implications, passed through the Assembly Health Committee on September 23, with a party-line vote of 5-3 (with one notable abstention.)
- The result was not unexpected, due to the nature of politics-as-usual in Trenton. What was most important on this day was raising awareness and showing up to speak truth to this arrogant abuse of power.
- With over10,000 emails sent in just 3 short days, New Jersey residents made their voices heard even before the hearing began and confirmed what has already been demonstrated time and time again: New Jersey residents cherish Medical Freedom and will oppose anyone getting in the way of that for themselves and their families.
- Several New Jersey organizations were also present in person to participate in the hearing, testifying in eloquent opposition. These included NJPHIPAC, New Jersey Stands Up, Working Together for New Jersey, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and more.
- The defense of the bill was left to its sponsor, Assemblyman Herb Conaway, Jr., as none of the committee members who were there to vote in favor bothered to ask any questions or offer any reason for their “yes” votes. This was probably a wise choice as Conaway himself struggled to respond substantively to the many pertinent objections raised against the bill and ultimately failed to make a case that the proposed legislation is even necessary.
- Unable to justify making it essentially illegal to question “contemporary medical consensus” Conaway amended the bill on the floor to remove the phrase altogether. However, rather than making the bill clearer or more coherent, the amendment actually only made it more vague and dangerous.
- As amended, the current version of the bill would punish health care professionals who offered advice or treatment that is “false.” The word “false” is undefined in the bill and creates an open ended invitation for abuse,’confusion and endless litigation.
- A1884 has now been referred to the Assembly Regulated Professions Committee (ARP) and may still be heard in that committee before it moves on to the General Assembly.
- If this bill becomes law, bill A1884 will deem the act of providing medical advice or treatment that does not conform to some undefined, shifting standard to be considered professional misconduct and punished accordingly. The licenses and livelihoods of everyone who qualifies as a “health care professional” in the state of New Jersey – not just doctors and nurses – would thereafter be threatened.
- Key Questions Raised:
- Who will determine what is considered outside of the “scientific consensus”?
- Could this bill stifle scientific progress in New Jersey, as it might have prevented questioning outdated practices like lobotomies?
- Why would a patient need a second opinion if healthcare professionals would be prohibited from dissenting with each other?
- Will pharmaceutical representatives’ conversations/content also be scrutinized for misinformation/disinformation?
- If this bill passes, how will this “misinformation/disinformation” be enforced? Will healthcare professionals be reported or disciplined for offering advice outside of “scientific consensus?”
- Are New Jersey legislators attempting to silence healthcare professionals and infringe upon free speech?
- Will this bill transform New Jersey into a medical police state, where dissenting medical opinions are punished rather than discussed and further studied?
- Haven’t we learned from the mistakes of the COVID-19 pandemic in that some of the interventions and treatments recommended based on consensus from the medical community turned out to have devastating consequences for patients (ie: intubation and Remdesivir).
- Doesn’t this bill contradict the fluid and evolving nature of the scientific method?
- How will this bill affect medical professionals’ use of new treatments or those being used successfully “off-label”?
- Will this bill prevent medical professionals from thinking ‘outside the box’ when dealing with difficult-to-treat and rare diseases/illnesses?
- Will chiropractors, acupuncturists, mental healthcare professionals, social workers be targeted by this bill as well? Will this restrict social workers in sessions with patients’ and their ability to speak freely and have open discussions on various topics? This seems like a very slippery slope.
- ACTION: Email the Assembly Health committee and your local Assemblymember and ask them to oppose the bill. Protecting public health is vital, but it should not come at the expense of medical freedom, innovation, and the ability of healthcare professionals to provide individualized patient care according to their own professional experience and judgement.