Visit the Stand for Health Freedom Data Center Toolkit for background information, printable at-a-glance information sheets, relevant news articles, and other resources to help you understand how surveillance technology is a threat to our privacy, our informed consent, our families, and our health.
Support the Flock-Off Act
Technology may change, but our constitutional rights do not.
Our Stand: At-A-Glance
- “Technology may change, but our constitutional rights do not,” said Congressman Eric Burlison, a co-sponsor of the Flock-Off Act, H.R. 10221.
- There has been an explosion of technological surveillance of innocent Americans since COVID (the surveillance creep really started after 9/11).
- Much of the technology has moved so fast and been adopted so quickly by governments and private parties that American citizens had no real chance to have input on whether they want to trade safety for our hard-fought natural rights.
- Flock cameras are only one piece of a much larger surveillance ecosystem. Smartphones, health wearables, connected vehicles, smart home devices, retail analytics, facial recognition systems, and artificial intelligence are all contributing to an increasingly connected digital infrastructure.
- The question is not whether technology can or should help keep communities safe. It is whether the expansion of surveillance is occurring within legal bounds and with sufficient transparency, accountability, constitutional safeguards, and public consent.
- The Flock-Off Act would prohibit the use of Federal funds to purchase, install, maintain, operate, or upgrade automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and biometric surveillance cameras.