ATTENTION CALIFORNIA: Click now to say kids must NOT be vaccinated without their parents knowledge!

Our Stand

  • SB 866, California’s Minor Vaccine Consent bill, passed the Assembly Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, June 1 with a 6-4 vote. The bill may head to the Assembly floor as soon as Monday, June 6th, 2022
  • This bill allows allows a minor 12 years of age or older to consent to a vaccine that is approved by the FDA and meets the recommendations from the CDC without the consent of the parent or guardian.
  • Minor consent bills subvert the right and duty of parents to make informed decisions about whether or not their children should receive medical treatment.
  • Minors may not know their full medical history and the potential risks of vaccination, and will not have knowledge what to look for if they do have an adverse reaction. If their parents are not aware of their 12+ year old minor’s vaccination, treatment of a serious adverse reaction may be delayed because the parents could not convey the child’s medical history accurately.
  • The vaccine providers are taking on the adult role in the vaccine decision making process for a minor. Currently, per the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, vaccine providers have no liability if the child dies or suffers serious injuries directly caused by the administration of a vaccine. This would leave parents, who did not consent to the vaccination, fully responsible for the treatment of their child’s injuries.
  • SB 866 “would not authorize the vaccine provider to provide any service that is otherwise outside the vaccine provider’s scope of practice.” The bill therefore allows for broad medical treatment for 12+ year old minors, during a visit where a vaccination is also administered, given most pediatric vaccine providers are physicians or pharmacists.
  • The bill is part of an aggressive nationwide trend to erode parental rights and religious rights. Click now to send a pre-drafted, customizable e-mail to your local Assembly member now and tell them that no one knows their kids like their parents do, and Californian’s will not stand for this erosion or our natural born rights and liberties. 
  • For more information, please go to our California partner, A Voice for Choice Advocacy’s page here and see their additional talking points and possible amendment options.

Your home address information is required from the legislative offices to ensure you are reaching out to your designated representatives. Your email and your phone number are used to establish connection with your designated representatives. Messages from non-constituents don't have the same impact on a legislator as messages from verified constituents, who can vote for that officeholder. We do not share your name and contact information with any third parties unless legally required to do so.


Have a question or need help?

Download our white paper on protecting your parental rights!

DOWNLOAD NOW

Call to Action

Violation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and Parental Rights

SB866 permits minor children 12 years and older to consent to any vaccine recommended by ACIP without a parent’s knowledge or consent.

Federal legislative history provides evidence that Congress never intended for a minor child to make decisions to get a vaccine without parents’ knowledge or consent.

When the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 198613 was passed, the Act clearly stated that before the administration of vaccines14 to a child, a health care provider shall give a copy of the CDC’s vaccine information materials to the, “parent or legal representative of any child to whom the provider intends to administer such vaccine…”

The CDC confirms that there is a requirement that their Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) is provided to the parent/legal guardian prior to vaccination of a minor child on their VIS Q&A page.15 Under the question, “Is there a requirement to verify that parents/legal representatives have actually received and reviewed the VIS,” the answer is a clear “YES”.

These requirements under federal law for a parent to be educated with CDC materials prior to their minor child being vaccinated will not be met if a child is allowed to make these decisions on their own.

The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the right of parents to be an active and integral part of their children’s lives as perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the Supreme] Court. Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2000)16

SB866 Endangers the Health and Well Being of Children

A minor child is far less likely than an adult parent to understand personal and family medical history, including vaccine reactions, allergies, and autoimmune or neurological disorders.

Children do not have the same kind of critical thinking skills or emotional maturity required to make a well-informed vaccine benefit-risk decision compared to an adult. Vaccines can cause injury and death as evidenced by the creation of a federally operated Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which has paid out more than $4.4 billion to vaccine victims.17

If a child consents to vaccination without their parent’s knowledge and has a reaction, the parent may not recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and the reason for their child’s sudden personality change and decline in physical, mental or emotional health; this lack of knowledge could be life threatening for the child. The parent’s lack of knowledge about the fact that their child was given vaccines that carry a risk of injury or death may well prevent the parent from seeking immediate medical care.

Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act18 Congress gave partial liability protection to vaccine manufacturers in 1986 and then added an amendment giving vaccine administrators liability protection from vaccine injury lawsuits in 1987. In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court judges in Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al19 affirmed that government licensed and recommended childhood vaccines were “unavoidably unsafe” and effectively removed all remaining liability from vaccine manufacturers. Today, pharmaceutical companies making and selling vaccines and doctors and other vaccine administrators have no legal accountability or financial liability in civil court when a mandated vaccine causes permanent injury or death.

There is no justification for the state to eliminate a parent’s legal and moral right to make an informed benefit and risk decision about vaccination on behalf of a minor child, especially when doctors and other vaccine providers have no liability or accountability for what happens to the child after vaccination.

Take Action

Share This